Is the Jerusalem Cross Catholic or Protestant?

The Jerusalem cross predates the Reformation, so no denomination owns it. Here is who actually wears it, and whether you can.

Short answer: neither, and both. The Jerusalem cross took its familiar form in the twelfth century, roughly four hundred years before there was any such thing as a Protestant. No church invented it, no denomination owns it, and no major Christian tradition forbids it. If you are wondering whether you can wear one without accidentally declaring a theology, you can.

That said, the symbol does carry institutional associations, and they are mostly Catholic. It is worth knowing what they are — both so you understand what you are wearing, and so you can answer the question when someone asks.

templar collection

Where the symbol actually comes from

The design is a large cross potent — a cross whose four arms end in crossbars, like crutch heads — with four smaller Greek crosses set in the quarters. Five crosses in all. Its earliest firm association is with the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the crusader state founded after 1099, whose attributed arms were a gold cross on silver.

That colour scheme is worth a footnote, because heraldry nerds still argue about it. Placing gold on silver breaks the heraldic “rule of tincture,” which normally forbids metal on metal. The usual explanation is that Jerusalem was considered so exceptional that the rule was suspended for it. Whether that was the real reason or a later rationalisation, the arms stood out — which, for a kingdom claiming the holiest ground in Christendom, was presumably the point.

Crucially, all of this happened in the twelfth century. The Reformation began in 1517. Any question of the cross being “Catholic” or “Protestant” is a question about a symbol that is several centuries older than the distinction.

What the five crosses are supposed to mean

There is no single official reading, and anyone who tells you there is one is overstating the evidence. Three interpretations have real currency:

  • The Five Wounds of Christ — the four crosslets as the nail wounds in the hands and feet, the central cross as the spear wound in the side. This is the most widely repeated reading and the one with the deepest devotional history; we cover it in detail in our piece on the Five Wounds of Christ.
  • Christ and the four Evangelists — the centre as Christ, the quarters as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
  • The gospel going out to the four corners of the earth — Jerusalem at the centre, the faith spreading outward. This reading suits the symbol’s pilgrimage role particularly well.

None of these are doctrinally loaded. None belong to one confession. For a fuller treatment of the arithmetic and its symbolism, see why the Jerusalem cross has five crosses.

Saint Michael — Defend Us in Battle

Faith worn plainly, without a denominational argument attached.

🇺🇸 Fast US shipping · 🇪🇺 Ships across the EU · 🔒 Secure checkout

Shop the collection →

The Catholic associations are real

If the cross reads as Catholic to many people, that is because its most visible institutional users are Catholic bodies:

  • The Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land. The Franciscans have been the official custodians of the Catholic holy places in the region since the fourteenth century, and the Jerusalem cross is their emblem. If you have seen it on a signboard in the Old City, this is usually why.
  • The Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem. A papal order of knighthood whose members wear the cross in red. Its visibility at Catholic ceremonies does a great deal to fix the symbol as Catholic in people’s minds.

Those are genuine, current, formal uses. They explain the association honestly. What they do not do is make the symbol exclusive — an emblem adopted by an order is not thereby forbidden to everyone else.

And Protestants wear it too

They do, routinely, and there is a structural reason why it sits comfortably in Protestant settings. The objection some Reformed and evangelical Christians raise about Catholic devotional jewellery concerns the crucifix — a cross bearing the body of Christ — on the grounds that it dwells on the death rather than the resurrection. Many prefer an empty cross.

The Jerusalem cross is an empty cross. There is no corpus, no saint, no Marian imagery, nothing that touches a point of confessional disagreement. It is a geometric emblem of the city where the events of the gospel happened.

Its other great carrier is pilgrimage, which crosses denominational lines completely. Pilgrims of every tradition have brought the Jerusalem cross home for centuries, on medals, on rosaries, on wood, and — in a tradition running back several hundred years among Christian pilgrims to the city — tattooed. A Baptist, a Lutheran, an Anglican and a Copt can all return from Jerusalem wearing the same mark.

So can you wear one?

Yes, with three sensible caveats:

  1. Know what it is. If someone asks, “that’s the Jerusalem cross — the arms of the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, five crosses for the five wounds” is a complete and accurate answer.
  2. Be aware of the crusader association. The symbol’s history is tied to the crusades, and a minority of people read it politically rather than devotionally. That is worth knowing before you wear it somewhere the distinction matters.
  3. Do not claim an order you are not in. Wearing the cross is open to anyone. Wearing the specific insignia of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, with its particular form and colour, is not — the same courtesy that applies to any other order’s regalia.

Beyond that, there is no gate. The Jerusalem cross is one of the few major Christian symbols that genuinely belongs to the whole church, for the simple reason that it was settled long before the church divided. If you want the broader family of crusader emblems and what separates them, the Jerusalem cross and what it means walks through the whole set.

Other five-cross designs people confuse with it

Two near-neighbours cause most of the mix-ups, and telling them apart is easy once you know what to look at.

The flag of Georgia — the country, not the US state — shows a large red cross with four smaller crosses in the quarters, and at a glance it reads as a Jerusalem cross. It is not. The Georgian crosses are Bolnisi crosses, flared at the ends, and the central cross is a plain St George’s cross without crossbars. The design is an independent national-religious emblem with its own history, adopted in its modern form in 2004.

The cross crosslet fitchy and various quartered heraldic crosses also turn up in search results for “cross with four crosses around it.” The test is always the centre: if the central cross has crossbars on all four arms, you are looking at a cross potent, and a cross potent with four crosslets is the Jerusalem cross. If the arms end plain, flared or pointed, it is something else. the Templar cross versus the Maltese cross runs the same comparison for the Maltese cross, which trips people up for different reasons.

A note on the crusader question

It would be dishonest to write about this symbol without addressing it. The Jerusalem cross is the emblem of a crusader kingdom, and the crusades were a violent episode that modern Christians of every tradition assess differently.

What can be said accurately is that the symbol’s continuous living use for the last several centuries has been devotional and pilgrim rather than military — Franciscan custodians, returning pilgrims, parish gifts, jewellery brought home from the Holy Land. Most people wearing one today are expressing faith or a journey, not a position on the twelfth century. That is worth knowing if you wear one, and worth remembering before assuming the worst of someone who does.

Wearing it well

A symbol this old does best when it is worn plainly rather than loudly. Heavy distressed type, a single strong ink, no glitter — the design should look like something that has been carried for a while, because the thing it represents has been. Our Saint Michael — Defend Us in Battle tee sits in the same register: a line of faith that needs no explanation and makes no confessional claim.

The question “is it Catholic or Protestant” turns out to be the wrong question. The Jerusalem cross is Christian, in the oldest and least complicated sense of the word. Four hundred years before anyone had to choose a side, it already meant the city, the wounds, and the gospel going out from there. That is what you are wearing.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Jerusalem cross Catholic?

Not exclusively. It took its present form in the twelfth century, four centuries before the Reformation, so it predates the Catholic–Protestant distinction entirely. Its most visible institutional users today are Catholic — the Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre — which is why many people read it as Catholic, but no denomination owns it.

Can Protestants wear the Jerusalem cross?

Yes. It is an empty cross rather than a crucifix, carries no Marian or saintly imagery, and touches no point of confessional disagreement. It is widely worn by Anglicans, Lutherans, Baptists and other Protestants, particularly as a pilgrimage keepsake from Jerusalem.

What do the five crosses mean?

There is no single official interpretation. The three common readings are the Five Wounds of Christ, Christ with the four Evangelists, and the gospel going out from Jerusalem to the four corners of the earth.

What is the difference between the Jerusalem cross and the crusader cross?

In ordinary use they are the same object — ‘crusader cross’ is a looser popular label and can also refer to other crusader-era emblems. ‘Jerusalem cross’ names the specific design: a central cross potent with four smaller crosses in the quarters.

Is the Jerusalem cross the same as the Georgian flag?

No. The Georgian flag uses four Bolnisi crosses around a plain St George’s cross. The Jerusalem cross has a central cross potent, whose arms end in crossbars. The centre is the tell.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like